Lifel1k3 is the Real Deal, Not a Cheap Piece of Fugazi

6105kSuTLdLI had never heard of Jay Kristoff before this year, which most book bloggers would take as a sign that I’ve had my head buried under a rock. Along with Amie Kaufman, he wrote the Illuminae Files, a wildly popular series, which may be turned into a movie sometime in the near future.

After reading Kristoff’s Lifel1k3, I’ve succumbed to a full-on case of FOMO and will be reading every last thing he has ever written. It’s just that good. No, it’s better than you might imagine. In fact, if an aspiring author wanted me to suggest something for her to read which hit every note perfectly, which was paced exceptionally well, which asked big questions, and which was thrilling to read from start to finish, I’d hand her a copy of Lifel1k3 without thinking twice.

Frankly, I was surprised that I liked the book so much. Nothing about it is usual for me. I don’t read a lot of post-apocalyptic sci-fi and the idea of synthetic lifeforms only interests me in so far as they might be programmed to make coffee or do the particularly disgusting parts of housekeeping like cleaning out the cat box.

Why did I buy a copy? Well, I was in my favorite book store, the scent of fresh paper and ink was heady, and I liked the cover. It looks like a honeycomb and made my mouth water.

What is it about? I’ve heard it described as a mash-up between Romeo and Juliet and The Terminator. That’s fairly accurate, except it doesn’t capture its humor and philosophical earnestness.

The main character is a seventeen year-old girl who is trying to scrape out a living on a junk heap situated in the middle of a radioactive wasteland. All she wants to do is make enough money to buy her grandfather some medicine to ease his suffering and avoid local gangs and religious zealots. Unfortunately, she attracts all the wrong kind of attention when the robot gladiator she built ends up as a smoking pile of spare parts and it looks like she destroyed its opponent with the power of her mind.

A host of fascinating characters accompany Eve on her adventures. There’s Cricket, her cautious robotic sidekick; and Kaiser, a loyal robotic dog. True to their artificial nature, they don’t evolve throughout the course of the novel. Their constancy is a helpful touchstone and is what we end up loving about them.

Lemon Fresh is Eve’s best friend and the fizziest character imaginable. Even when things are at their worst, she hitches up her sassy pants, throws down some eye-popping taunts, and reaffirms her love for her best friend.

“I don’t care who’s after you. Where you’re from or where you’re going. It’s you, me, Crick and Kaiser. No matter what. Rule Number One in the Scrap, remember? Stronger together, together forever.”

Finally, there’s Ezekiel, the impossibly perfect Lifel1k3 who will protect Eve at all costs, but whom she doesn’t trust. If one could imagine the perfect lover, he would be remarkably similar to Ezekiel: dimples, chiseled abs and a penchant for saying the right thing at the right time:

“Deviation’ or whatever you want to call it? That’s just another expression of it. You call it freakish. I call it incredible.” (Translation: you’re perfect because of your faults, not despite them.)

Every romantic on the planet will swoon when he or she reads this line:

“It’s simple to love someone on the days that are easy. But you find out what your love is made of on the days that are hard.”

This rag-tag bunch takes off on a doomed flight, travels through the belly of a sea beast, scrambles through the warrens of a crime-ridden city and races across the desert to rescue Eve’s grandfather and find sanctuary.

There’s scarcely a moment to breathe between one crazy, heart-pounding experience and the next. The pacing makes it nearly impossible to put this book down. If I were to suggest one critique of the book, it would be this: There weren’t enough quiet moments for the reader to look around, absorb everything and get her bearings. I only offer that in a half-hearted fashion, though.

Lifel1k3 poses some deep questions: How real is too real? Is truth really more important than belief? Does one’s past matter as much as one’s present? Is subjugation of any class of beings ever acceptable? If you don’t truly know yourself, can you truly love? Why do villains like chewing tobacco so much?

Can you pass the acid test?

Image result for electric kool aid acid test art

When news of Tom Wolfe’s death circulated in May, I took time to appreciate his legacy by reading The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test. The book was originally published in 1968. It was a ground-breaking fusion of journalism and literary techniques that documented the exploits of Ken Kesey and his Merry Pranksters as they roamed around the US in a luridly painted school bus during the 1960’s. They sought to “turn on” the masses to group consciousness while experimenting with LSD and multimedia displays.

Considering its subject matter, it’s no surprise the book is simultaneously one of the most confounding things I’ve ever read and one of the most intriguing.

Right off the first page, the confusion begins. The language is poetic, elliptical, littered with participles and metaphors, esoteric concepts and brain fry. I struggled with this at first, trying to parse out each sentence and check for understanding. This approach didn’t get me very far. I gave in to the rising tide of the words and let them wash over me, just as I would do when listening to music.

“It’s like a boulder rolling down a hill – you can watch it and talk about it and scream and say Shit! but you can’t stop it. It’s just a question of where it’s going to go.” – Tom Wolfe, The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test

I experienced the book in a more physical way than I would have ordinarily done. It wasn’t a mere intellectual exercise. It was a full mind-body experience. The passing of time, the rhythm of the words, the sensual curl of a phrase, like a tentacle of marijuana smoke–all worked their way into my perception. And, like some of the people in the book, I experienced some moments of exceptional clarity.

So, I said to myself, that’s what it was all about! I get it now.

I was referring both to the significance of the historical events recounted in the book and to my own experiences of bohemian living, spiritual exploration and coming of age.

I’m still trying to understand how Tom Wolfe could have created such a vivid picture of this psychedelic movement without ever taking LSD–and as one of the key practitioners of “new journalism,” where the journalist immerses himself in the scene he’s reporting on, it’s rather surprising. Perhaps it’s not as impossible to understand the state of consciousness brought on by such a drug when you spend enough time surrounded by people who used it frequently and were themselves masters of explanation and expression. Ken Kesey, the award winning author of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, was one of Tom Wolfe’s primary sources, after all.

The second aspect of the book that’s confounding is the huge cast of characters. Under ordinary circumstances, it’s difficult to keep track of many people. What makes it even more challenging in this book is that they are referenced by both their conventional names and by the names they assumed when they joined the ranks of the Merry Pranksters, or in the parlance of the book, “got on the bus.” Among the ranks were Swashbucker, Speed Limit, Stark Naked, Hassler, Intrepid Traveler, Sometimes Missing, Dis-Mount, Gretchin Fetchin, Mal Function, Zonker, Mountain Girl, and Doris Delay. Most likely, had I read this when it was first published, a number of these people wouldn’t have needed an introduction. Neal Cassady, for instance, was a prominent member of the Beat Generation and was featured in Kerouc’s On the Road. Mentions were also made of Hell’s Angels, Allen Ginsberg, Timothy Leary, the Beatles, and the Grateful Dead. Wolfe often springs these people on the reader with little explanation until ten or twenty pages later. It’s worth the effort to figure out who’s who, because they are all interesting people in their own right.

There’s a lot of info about the Merry Pranksters on the web, some of which meshes with what’s in Wolfe’s book and some of which does not. In particular, the story of Cathy Casamo (a.k.a. Stark Naked) is wrapped up in controversy. Her portrayal in the book is that of a bus drop-out who had a very bad trip and ended up in the loony bin. Her friends contend that that’s an unfair description and remain upset with the Pranksters who abandoned her in Texas. They want to clear up the notion about her allegedly impaired mental health. They claim her seeming insanity was just the result of being really, really high and that she ultimately recovered.

New journalism may require the immersion of self into a story, but this method does not guarantee that one’s understanding of events will be entirely accurate–and of course, there’s the matter of bias.

For instance, consider the gang rape scene at the historic party at La Honda in August 1965. Wolfe describes the party in a effervescent fashion, a successful meeting of two disparate groups.

“Everybody, Angels and Pranksters, had a righteous time and no heads were broken.”

 – Tom Wolfe, The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test

He concedes that there was indeed a gang bang, but that the girl in question was a volunteer, so it was ok. Wolfe wasn’t actually at the party, so his impression was derived second hand.

Hell's Angels: A Strange and Terrible Saga: A Strange and Terrible Saga by [Thompson, Hunter S.]Hunter S. Thompson was actually at the party and wrote about the gang rape scene in his fascinating book on the Hell’s Angels. He was much less dispassionate about it then Wolfe. While not prepared to completely denounce the Angels at the time, referring to the scene as “somewhere between a friendly sex orgy and an all-out gang rape,” he registers some unease about the nature of the girl’s consent to the sex act.


She “agreed to make the beast with two backs […] and happily so, with the chosen trio. But word quickly spread of the ‘new mama’ and soon she was surrounded by a large group of onlookers…drinking, laughing and taking a quick turn whenever some vacancy occurred.”  – Hunter S. Thompson, Hell’s Angels: A Strange and Terrible Saga

He notes that she “seems drunk, incoherent, not knowing, drowning…” Thompson continues, “It was not a particularly sexual scene. The impression I had at the time was one of vengeance. The atmosphere in the room was harsh and brittle, almost hysterical.”

Reading Thompson’s account cast a pall over the lighthearted impression I had gleaned from Wolfe’s, where the Hell’s Angels appeared like fierce-looking, but cuddly giants, whose humor was rough, but their belly laughs contagious.

What I liked best about the book was also what frustrated me the most about it. The narrative style is both brilliant in its conception and in its execution. It’s also challenging to read. It inspired me to wonder about reality, about perception, about who, what and when. I wouldn’t go so far as to say it made me wish I had been “on the bus.” All things considered, the heat, the smell, the terrible suspension and the unrelenting cacophony created by the variable lag sound system would have made me one cranky person. The pranksters’ stint in Mexico sounded even more hellacious. However, being able to opt out of conventional society, to boldly seek out Edge City and to live with the courage of one’s convictions–that has a timeless appeal.